Trump
Donald J. Trump
Mentioned 4 months ago
All Hell Breaks Loose as Trump Goes Missing on World Stage!!
Ben, Brett and Jordy Meiselas are three brothers with very unique backgrounds! Ben is a top lawyer and Colin Kaepernick’s business partner. Brett is a two-time Emmy award winning video editor from the world of film and television. Jordy, the fan favorite, was an award-winning advertising executive i...
Recently mentioned
The book was repeatedly brought up as a focal point in the hosts’ critique of JD Vance, highlighting his alleged misrepresentation of Appalachian life and his shifting support for Donald Trump. The hosts described the memoir as a bestseller that nonetheless "trashed" the community it purported to depict, and they used it to question Vance’s credibility and motives. Overall, the discussion was sharply critical, framing the title as a tool for political opportunism rather than a genuine account.
In his book, "Hillbilly Elegy", J.D. Vance, Donald Trump's vice president pick, called the working class people of this country lazy, said they were on welfare, and that they were just not as good as everybody else.
If you read his book that he got famous on, there are so many passages throughout that book that he wrote that kind of rose him to prominence. Hillbilly Elegy, I believe it's called, where he just calls the working class people of this country lazy. He says that they're on welfare. He says they're just not as good as everybody else.
He makes a lot of comments that shows his pure disdain for working class people.
The book, which became a bestseller, was about Vance's upbringing in a poor, white family in Appalachia and was made into a movie that was a smash hit.
He wrote the book that became a bestseller. The movie became a smash hit. He's a very smart guy without the benefit of having a family that has contacts like a father that was well connected. He got into Yale Law School.
J.D. Vance was criticized for telling his son to "shut the hell up" during a phone call with Donald Trump. He said that the call was very important and he was scared that Trump would be disappointed.
So I'm like oh no. So I call Trump and I'm like hey sir what's going on? He's like J.D. you missed a very important phone call and now I'm gonna have to pick somebody else.
And I'm you know I like tense up and almost have a heart attack. And the crazy thing about it is my son who's seven is in the hotel room with me and he's really into Pokemon cards right now. He's going through a Pokemon phase.
Are you guys into Pokemon? I am. Back in the day. That's a big phase right now I think in general. Yeah yeah so I mean he's really into it. So he's trying to talk to me about Pikachu and I'm on the phone with Donald Trump and
I'm like son shut the hell up for 30 seconds about Pikachu. It's the most important phone call of my life. Please just let me take this phone call.
So I call Trump and I'm like hey sir what's going on? He's like J.D. you missed a very important phone call and now I'm gonna have to pick somebody else.
J.D. Vance, the author of "Hillbilly Elegy", was mentioned during a discussion about Donald Trump's campaign. The speaker referred to Vance as a "never Trump guy" who had become a supporter of Trump.
J.D. Vance, author of Hillbilly Elegy.
J.D. Vance also thinks stepmoms aren't really moms. Women should be staying in marriages even if they're violent marriages.
It's hillbilly felony.
J.D. Vance was described as a phony, a fraud, and a weirdo who hates women. His past was unearthed, including multiple name changes, his claims of being gay growing up, and his misogynistic comments about childless women. He was also accused of faking his Appalachian background for his career and his book.
He becomes a different person.
That's also how he says that he was gay growing up and then he then became an extremist against the LGBTQ plus community.
He called childless cat ladies a big threat to democracy and other horrific misogynistic remarks.
Shady Vance did not have sexual relations with that couch.
His name is not JD Vance.
His name was James Donald Bowman.
He changed his names multiple times from James Donald Bowman to Jimmy Hamill.
Then right when he got married, he changed his name to JD Vance.
He's flipped his entire personality.
He made his whole initial career and sold books lying that he's from Appalachia.
He's quite literally a venture capitalist for- From Silicon Valley.
He's a character.
He is playing a portrayal of a type of human that he believes appeals to Appalachia.
He is a Silicon Valley tech bro who made his money working for Peter Thiel, who went back to Ohio and created a sham charity that exploited people who were suffering from the opioid epidemic.
He funded research from Purdue Pharma by hiring their researchers and gave no money to people who were actually suffering from the opioid epidemic.
It's such an abhorrent thing to say and it's something that I think resonates with so many women.
He's not a real person.
It was mentioned in the context of its author, J.D. Vance, who was criticized for his past negative views on Donald Trump and subsequent change of heart and praise of the former president.
He was a nobody. Shady Vance, author of Hillbilly Elegy. He came from nothing.
Shady is kissing my ass. He wants my support.
It was mentioned that J.D. Vance wrote this book and trashed Appalachia, which he is not even from, using stereotypes to mock those who live there, before transitioning to a Trump supporter.
And he wrote a book, Hillbilly Elegy, where he trashes Appalachia, where he's not even from.
It was mentioned that J.D. Vance wrote a best-selling book criticizing the community he came from, which was part of Governor Walz's criticism of him.
Like all regular people I grew up with in the heartland, JD studied at Yale, had his career funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, and then wrote a bestseller trashing that community.
It was mentioned that J.D. Vance, the author of Hillbilly Elegy, studied at Yale, had his career funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, and then wrote a bestseller criticizing that community. It was also mentioned within the context of a political discussion about Donald Trump and his campaign.
Like all regular people I grew up with in the heartland, J.D. studied at Yale, had his career funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, and then wrote a bestseller trashing that community.
He was a nobody JD Vance author of Hillbilly Elegy.
He came from nothing.
It was meant to be at least a little bit. Okay, freedom to rig elections, give votes to all children in this country. But let's give control over those votes to the parents of those children, the freedom to be racist. Now she wants to be known as black. So I don't know is she Indian or is she black and the freedom to control women.
The people who are most deranged and most psychotic are people who don't have kids.
It was mentioned that J.D. Vance, the author of 'Hillbilly Elegy', had written a book trashing the community he came from and was challenged to a debate by Tim Walz.
Like all regular people I grew up with in the heartland, J.D. studied at Yale, had his career funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, and then wrote a bestseller trashing that community.
And I got to tell you, I can't wait to debate the guy. That is if he's willing to get off the couch and show up.
or as I call him, Shady Vance,
Shady Vance, get off the couch and debate me.
He's the real deal. He is what JD Vance wishes that he were.
It was mentioned in relation to a short film called 'Hillbilly Felony', which was a parody of the book and Trump's relationship with its author, J.D. Vance.
It's called Hillbilly Felony, I guess the sequel to Hillbilly Elegy and it's the story of how Donald Trump and Shady Vance met.
It was mentioned as a memoir about a family and culture in crisis, and its themes were discussed in relation to Donald Trump's appeal to certain voters.
Joining us now, former Marine Yale Law School graduate and author J.D. Vance. He's out with a new book, Hillbilly Elegy, a memoir of a family and culture in crisis.
And a lot of the themes of the book relate to why we've seen voters respond to Donald Trump. Something we've talked a lot about here on the show.
It was mentioned in relation to J.D. Vance's commentary on the white working class and their response to Donald Trump, exploring themes of community, purpose, and crisis within those communities.
Joining us now, former Marine, Yale Law School graduate and author J.D. Vance. He's out with a new book, Hillbilly Elegy, a memoir of a family and culture in crisis.
And a lot of the themes of the book relate to why we've seen voters respond to Donald Trump, something we've talked a lot about here on the show.
For many, he is the only thing left that offers camaraderie, community, and a sense of purpose.
And I think that what's happened is where in these communities where everything has kind of fallen apart, folks aren't going to church, their kids are addicted to drugs, they don't have a whole lot left.
And Donald Trump is one of the few things that they do have. And I think it's unsurprising that he's not just popular, but in some ways, very, you know, a source of excitement and pride for folks in this community.
It was mentioned that J.D. Vance, Donald Trump's VP candidate, is the author of this book, although it was said he isn't actually a hillbilly and was from the suburbs of Ohio.
If you go and read the Hillbilly Elegy that he wrote though, he's not even like a hillbilly, like he's from the suburbs of Ohio.
The book was mentioned in relation to J.D. Vance, highlighting his past as the author before his political career trajectory.
J.D. Vance, author of Hillbilly Elegy.
J.D. Vance, the author of this book, was mentioned in the context of his political evolution regarding Donald Trump, noting his prior opposition and later support.
JD Vance, author of Hill Billy Elegy.
The host referenced the book while critiquing the idea of governmental immunity, noting that Vance's work highlighted hillbilly values and skepticism toward absolute government power.
He had a book, Hillbilly Elegy. And I can tell you, hillbilly values, at least from where I'm from in Appalachia, are that the government ought not be able to have absolute immunity when they shoot you in the face.
The hosts referenced the title multiple times to illustrate how the Trump administration's propaganda echoed Orwellian slogans such as "two and two makes five" and "war is peace," and later likened a judge's language to the Ministry of Truth. Jordy and Benji used the book as a lens to critique current political rhetoric, highlighting its relevance to contemporary events.
The hosts compared the judge's language to the writing in the novel, saying it sounded like the Ministry of Truth from 1984.
the judge sounded like the writing sounded like Jim Jordan tweets or like something you'd see on truth social like QAnon ... the judge sounded like the ministry of truth from 1984
The book was referenced multiple times when discussing the Trump regime's use of falsehoods, suggesting that concepts like 'two and two makes five,' 'war is peace,' 'freedom is slavery,' and 'ignorance is strength' perfectly described the administration's behavior.
It's a quote off. It's a quote off two and two makes five.
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. And ignorance is strength.
double think means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously and accepting both of them.
The host noted that Donald Trump borrowed a line from the novel, specifically the phrase "war is peace," highlighting a reference to the book's themes.
Now, this also comes at a time where there are wars across the world right now as Donald Trump, you know, borrows a line from 1984, war is peace.
The hosts referenced the novel to illustrate Trump's warmaking philosophy, noting the famous line "war is peace".
Trump is creating these wars around the world. But as they said in 1984, war is peace, right?
The hosts referenced the novel to describe the dystopian mindset of Trump and Russia, noting that "war is peace" from the book applied to their actions.
War is peace in 1984. And that's the dystopian world that Trump and Russia inhabit.
Orwell is just mass producing electricity in his grave right now.
The hosts likened the current political climate to George Orwell's novel, saying it felt like 1984 on steroids.
it's like 1984, Jordi, perhaps even worse, 1984, the book on steroids, Oral's book on steroids.
The hosts said Donald Trump was taking a page out of the playbook of dystopian 1984 predictions.
Now, we've been covering here on the Midas Touch Network how Donald Trump's weakness has led to all of these wars breaking out across the world. Donald Trump taking a page out of the playbook of dystopian 1984 predictions.
The hosts referenced Orwell's novel as being prophetic about authoritarian playbooks and future developments.
Orwell was so prophetic in writing 1984 that he saw the future.
The hosts referenced Orwell's novel to illustrate how its themes were prophetic of current events.
You can say Orwell, who wrote 1984, was prophetic.
The host referenced the dystopian novel when describing Besson's remarks, indicating it was used as a comparison.
Watch what Besson says right out of the dystopian 1984 novel.
The hosts noted that lawmakers were banning books such as1984 while also installing surveillance cameras in schools, highlighting a contradictory approach to censorship and control.
Kind of ironic that they're banning books like 1984 and then going ahead and installing cameras in schools so that parents could go and complain when they're being taught about America's history.
The hosts compared the current political climate to Orwell's dystopian novel, saying it was like 1984 taken to levels they could not have imagined a few years earlier.
It's 1984, taken to levels that we could not have even imagined a few years ago.
The host cited Orwell's dystopian novel while discussing a judicial ruling, using its themes to illustrate concerns about truth and historical manipulation.
She starts with a George Orwell quote. All history was a palimpset scraped clean and rescribed exactly as often as was necessary... George Orwell 1984. As if the ministry of truth in George Orwell's 1984 now existed with its motto ignorance is strength.
The host referenced the novel to illustrate the paradoxical slogans of the regime, noting that "War is peace and peace is war" as a comment on current events.
But isn't that what 1984 said? War is peace and peace is war. That's what we try to do here on the Midas Touch Network.
The hosts referenced the novel when discussing the paradox of "peace is war, war is peace," using it as a cultural shorthand for authoritarian contradictions.
Peace is war. War is peace. 1984 or well.
The book was invoked in three episodes as a cautionary analogy, with the hosts and guests using its dystopian imagery to warn that current political actions resembled the novel's oppressive themes. They cited potential deportations and the erosion of freedoms as akin to the story's concentration camps and handmaid scenario. The discussion focused on critiquing the political climate rather than recommending the title.
The speaker used the book to illustrate the danger of Donald Trump potentially deporting 15 million people, saying they might end up in concentration camps before deportation.
I don't want The Handmaid's Tale streamed in America for real life when he tries to deport 15 million people.
You got to put them in concentration camps before you can figure out where to deport them.
The hosts referenced the GOP Handmaid's Tale video they released, explaining it depicted a young woman crossing the border and being pulled over, noting the ad had originally aired in 2021.
We talk about the GOP Handmaid's Tale video that we had released about the young lady crossing the border with her mother and then getting pulled over by the police. When we released that ad, we initially released that ad back in 2021.
The hosts compared the current political climate to the novel, calling it horrific and likening the loss of freedoms to the story.
I mean, it's horrific to it's horrific. It's sick. It's handmaid's tale. But that is who the Republican parties are taking away our freedoms.
The hosts noted that the series could no longer be watched because it was no longer considered parody, implying the book's themes were too real to be treated as satire.
Well, here's the thing. Like, and this is kind of the progression of like, first it was like, wait a minute. You can't even watch Handmaid's Tale anymore because that's not parody.
The hosts noted that Ben mistakenly referred to the novel as the "handmaiden's tale" and also confused the title of the related TV series, highlighting his mixup of cultural references.
It's because Ben has apparently entered his phase of life where he gets the names of TV shows wrong. And so Ben called it the handmaiden's tale. It's The Handmaid's Tale. It's like when Ben also now starts to call it Games of Thrones instead of Game of Thrones.
The hosts mentioned the book as something they stopped watching because it felt exaggerated compared to real radical right actions.
It's not an exaggeration. The Handmaid's Tale. I had to stop watching it because in many ways, the radical right here goes further than, you know, goes further than him.
The hosts referenced the novel to illustrate a dystopian scenario, urging listeners not to let oppressive forces defeat them.
We made a reference to Handmaid's Tale earlier in this episode, right? ... The Handmaid's Tale was mentioned to highlight how the current political climate feels like a dystopia.
Well, there is a translated phrase from that show that I want you to leave the show with. And that's, don't let the bastards get you down.
The Art of the Deal
The book was mentioned as a personal favorite by one host, while other hosts denounced it as the biggest sham and used it to illustrate Trump's poor negotiating reputation and disputed authorship claims. They also referenced Trump's own bragging about its sales, framing the title as a symbol of his questionable credibility. Overall, the podcast treated the book with a critical tone.
The book was described as a sham by Jordy, arguing that Trump is the worst negotiator ever and is unable to cope with the current situation.
I just gotta say like the art of the deal is the biggest sham book in the world.
The guy is literally the worst negotiator ever.
Like he's must have never read how to win friends and influence people because it's unbelievable.
It was mentioned in relation to Donald Trump's reputation for making poor deals, as the podcast hosts believe he made a bad deal by agreeing to the debates.
And that's the thing Donald Trump makes the worst deals over and over again.
Donald Trump's books were mentioned in the context of his claims that they were ghostwritten and therefore the words within them couldn't be attributed to him, which the DA contested.
He wanted to exclude his own statements and speeches and statements that he's made in books claiming that he doesn't really write his own books. They're ghost written and therefore it's here say and those words can't be attributed to him.
...the fact that defendant Trump suggests that books he authored and sold under his name may not in fact contain his own statements because he wrote those books with ghost writers goes to the weight and not to the admissibility of those evidence of the evidence you said it these are your words stop trying to run away from your own conduct is what the DA is saying right here...
It was mentioned as Donald Trump's favorite book, and it was alluded to in the context of his business dealings.
I joke very much so they always hold up the art of the deal I say my second favorite book of all time but I just think the Bible is just something very special.
Donald Trump mentioned his book sales, including 'The Art of the Deal', which were described as big and tremendous sellers, even currently.
I did the apprentice and I did lots of books that were big, big, big, big sellers. Even now I have books that are tremendous sellers.
The book was mentioned as one of the podcast host's favorite books.
the art of the deal. Great book, the Bible even better.
I joke very much so they always hold up the art of the day. I say my second favorite book of all time.
The hosts repeatedly used the book as a benchmark, noting that the number of Donald Trump references in the Epstein files exceeded the total mentions of the title across the entire seven‑book series. They highlighted this comparison in three episodes to illustrate the sheer volume of Trump mentions. The discussion was informal and did not constitute a recommendation of the book.
The hosts noted that the Epstein files contain more references to Donald Trump than the entire sevenbook Harry Potter series, citing over 38,000 Trump mentions.
Did you know that there are more references to Donald Trump in the Epstein files than there are references to Harry Potter in all seven Harry Potter books? Yeah, there's over 38,000 references to Donald Trump in the Epstein file.
The hosts compared the number of references to Trump in the Epstein files to the number of references to Harry Potter across all seven books, highlighting the sheer volume of Trump mentions.
there are more references to Trump in the Epstein files than there is to Jesus in the New Testament, than there is to Harry Potter in all seven Harry Potter books.
The host claimed that Donald Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files more often than Harry Potter's name appears across all seven Harry Potter books.
I saw this one meme over here that says Donald, it's true, though, that Donald Trump, Donald Trump's name appears more in the Epstein files than Harry Potter's name appears in all seven Harry Potter books.
Ben claimed that the Epstein files contained more references to Donald Trump than the Harry Potter books.
More references to Donald Trump in the Epstein files that have been released than Harry and Harry Potter, than God or Jesus in the freaking Bible, folks.
The hosts compared Trump's name appearing in the Epstein files to the name Harry in Harry Potter, highlighting how frequently Trump was mentioned.
Your name appears more in the Epstein files than the name Harry in Harry Potter.
A Memoir
The hosts highlighted that the former personal attorney detailed Trump’s reimbursement payments and business practices in the book, urging listeners to read it for deeper insight. They also referenced the memoir as evidence of Trump’s deflection tactics, noting the author discussed these patterns across his works. Overall, the discussion presented the book as a valuable source for understanding the former president’s behavior.
It was mentioned that Michael Cohen discussed the reimbursement payment and Trump's business practices in his book 'Disloyal'.
And Cohen talked about that in his book. It's inDisloyal. If you go read his book, he talked about it. It wasn't like Trump's lawyer went, aha, look what I've discovered. Just go and read Cohen's book, do a scintilla of research, and you would uncover that.
The previously released book was referenced as an example of Cohen discussing Donald Trump's deflection tactics.
I also talk about that not only in this book, but in my previous book, Disloyal. Donald is the world's greatest deflector.
It's called deflection. I also talk about that not only in this book, but in my previous book, Disloyal.
The hosts highlighted Cohen's memoirDisloyal, noting that it had become a bestseller and was the numberone book in the country at the time.
Cohen, what can we expect for you in 2022? You got the Mea Culpa podcast. I mean, your book, Disloyal, bestseller, number one book in the country. What do we expect?
The hosts noted that Michael Cohen had authored a memoir titled Disloyal, in which he recounts his experiences and confrontations within the Trump inner circle.
I write about it in my book, Disloyal, where, you know, he would actually say shit to his father, then they would end up having a massive fight. Don almost didn't end up working at the Trump organization. He was tending bar somewhere. I think it was in Colorado, and the father said, either you get back within three weeks time or you're out. It's exactly the same relationship. It is.
The book was brought up as a coffee‑table compilation of letters Donald Trump received from world leaders like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong‑un, which he and his son promoted and sold for hundreds to thousands of dollars. Hosts highlighted it as a vanity project and a transactional grift rather than a substantive work, noting the questionable ethics of profiting from correspondence with dictators. The discussion was largely critical, portraying the title as a self‑serving gimmick.
It was mentioned that Donald Trump had compiled letters he received from Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un into a coffee table book and sold it for hundreds of dollars.
Donald Trump wrote a whole book, letters he received from fascists, not actually he wrote it, he took the letters he got from Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un, made a freaking coffee book, coffee table book and sold it for hundreds of dollars to grift off of his, they love those people.
It was mentioned that Donald Trump released a book titled "Letters to Trump", which contained letters he received from world leaders like Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin, and that he sold the books for hundreds, and even thousands, of dollars each.
he wrote a book... he didn't write it he put letters that he received from foreign genocidal maniac and rather than write an autobiography he released a book called Letters to Trump letters he received from kim jong un and vladimir putin and carry lake he made a whole coffee table book about that so we know that he will do some of that for vanity but it's always with the transactional end right
It was described as a compilation of letters received by Donald Trump, including those from individuals described as genocidal maniacs who wanted to harm the United States. Don Jr. was also mentioned as promoting the book, suggesting that it's a collection of letters from world leaders like Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin.
It's called Letters to Trump and it's a compilation of letters he received from genocidal maniacs who want to destroy the United States of America.
I put it together with my friends at Winning Team Publishing. This is Letters to Trump.
Guys, super excited about this book.
Donald Trump was promoting a book about letters that people wrote to him while he was in the White House, with an emphasis on letters sent to him by genocidal maniacs.
I find it pretty interesting that these genocidal maniacs sent you all of these letters. What a great book that you wrote.
What's your response like that.
And Donald Trump was all these they all seem to like me. They all seem like like what world is this a normal thing going on.
It is like in fact I get along much better with the genocidal maniacs than I do with the other people in the world.
It was mentioned as Donald Trump's second favorite book, after 'The Art of the Deal', and he was asked about his favorite verses but declined to share them, citing personal reasons.
I joke very much so they always hold up the art of the deal I say my second favorite book of all time but I just think the Bible is just something very special.
— Episode: GRIFTER Trump’s Christmas Message BACKFI...
It was mentioned as Donald Trump's second favorite book, after 'The Art of the Deal', and he was asked about his favorite verses but declined to share them, citing personal reasons.
I joke very much so they always hold up the art of the deal I say my second favorite book of all time but I just think the Bible is just something very special.
You mentioned the Bible you've been talking about how it's your favorite book and you said I think last night in Iowa some people are surprised that you say that I'm wondering what one or two of your most favorite Bible verses are.
I wouldn't want to get into it because to me that's very personal you know when I talk about the Bible is very personal so I don't want to get into verses I don't want to get into it.
The Bible means a lot to me but I don't want to get into specifics.
Even to cite a verse that you like. No I don't want to do that.
One of the podcast hosts discussed the Bible, citing its impact on their life and describing it as an incredible and special book, comparable to a great movie that improves with repeated viewings. The host mentioned specific verses, like 2 Corinthians 3:17, highlighting the concept of liberty.
The Bible is special. The Bible, the more you see it, the more you read it, the more incredible it is. The whole Bible is an incredible I joke very much so they always hold up the art of the day. I say my second favorite book of all time. But I just think the Bible is just something very special.
two Corinthians, right? Two Corinthians three seventeen. That's the whole ballgame where the spirit of the Lord, right where the spirit of the Lord is. There is liberty.
I think many. I mean, you know, when we get into the Bible, I think many so many and some people talk an eye for an eye. You can almost say that that's not a particularly nice thing. But, you know, if you look at what's happening to our country, I mean, when you see what's going on with our country, how people are taking advantage of us and and how they scoff at us and laugh at us and they laugh at our face.
You know, David, they say great art like the Mona Lisa. Some people, they look at it and it doesn't look as great at the beginning. And then they'll look at it by the time they see it many, many times, it becomes the most of they can't take their eyes off it. Whereas art that's not great. You look at it looks beautiful at the beginning, but you don't you get tired of it.
I don't like to use this analogy, but like great movie, a great, incredible movie. You'll see it once be good. You'll see it. You can see it 20 times and every time you'll appreciate it more. The Bible is the most special thing.
A reference was made that a controversial book being discussed was actually the Bible, underscoring the hosts' criticism of those who claim ignorance of its contents.
That book is actually the Bible.
The hosts referenced the book while discussing how Donald Trump allegedly showed classified war plans to its ghostwriter, using the encounter to boast about his superiority to the Joint Chiefs. Ben and Brett recounted audio tapes and indictment details, and Ben Meiselas highlighted the episode as evidence of Trump’s careless behavior. The book was mentioned primarily as a contextual detail rather than being endorsed.
J.D. Vance denied that Mike Pence was in danger on January 6th. Audiotapes of Donald Trump talking about war plans with the ghostwriter of Mark Meadows' books were mentioned.
He said he doubted that Mike Pence on January 6th was ever even in any danger and that there was any danger that day whatsoever.
We have audio tapes of Donald Trump talking about war plans with the ghostwriter of Mark Meadows' books.
It was mentioned that Donald Trump showed classified information to the ghostwriters of Mark Meadows's book, specifically Iranian war plans, which was later confirmed by the superseding indictment.
In the initial indictment, it didn't specifically say what those documents were and so Donald Trump and the Trump lawyers and they kind of fell right into Special Council, Jack Smith trap.
Well, Special Council, Jack Smith just said, checkmate, we've got the documents. They were the war plans. We know the exact documents that he was showing Mark Meadows and it's just so amateurish and thankfully Trump's such an idiot and his lawyers are so bad that he fell into that trap.
count 32, which relates to page 17 of the indictment now the superseding indictment makes it clear that those documents were Iranian war plans that Donald Trump was showing it and those documents are in the possession of Special Council, Jack Smith as well.
It talks about this encounter where Donald Trump's showing the classified material, the war plans for invading Iran to mark Meadows ghost riders saying doesn't this make me better than the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley.
Aren't I cooler than Mark Milley? Aren't I the best? Like that's actually what Donald Trump is saying.
It was mentioned in the context of Donald Trump showing ghost writers for the book plans, possibly related to national defense, and asking if they were better than Mark Milley.
Hey, you see these plans aren't I better than chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley? These are our plans to attack Iran. What do you think about this? Didn't I win? Aren't I a winner?
Inside the Trump White House
The hosts mentioned the title several times as part of a Blinkist recommendation list, noting it as a notable recent political book about the Trump White House. They referenced seeing extensive news coverage of the book and used the service to get its key points in a condensed form. The discussion highlighted its relevance to current events without offering a strong endorsement.
They mentioned the book as part of a list of titles they could recommend through Blinkist.
Fire and Fury. Fear. A Short History of Brexit. The list really goes on and you'll get the key points.
Fire and Fury was mentioned as one of the notable recent political books that the hosts were eager to read in condensed form.
I read Fire and Fury. And I remember seeing all the news reports coming out about this book.
He said he used Blinkist to read this book about the Trump White House, indicating its relevance to current events.
I use Blinkist to read Fire and Fury about the Trump White House.
25 Hidden Drivers of Optimal Performance
The podcast repeatedly highlighted the title as a Bookshop.org bestseller and a valuable guide to the hidden drivers of optimal performance. Host Ben Meiselas finished reading it and strongly recommended it, noting that it clarified why it was so popular. Overall, the book was presented as a highly recommended resource for listeners seeking performance insights.
Ben Meiselas highly recommended this book, which was a bestseller on Bookshop.org, as a guide to understanding the hidden drivers of optimal performance.
I just finished reading The Attributes, 25 Hidden Drivers of Optimal Performance by Rich Devinney and I cannot recommend it enough.
This is one of Bookshop.org's bestsellers and after reading through it, I totally understand why.
It was recently finished and highly recommended by one of the podcast hosts for its insights on optimal performance.
I just finished reading The Attributes 25 hidden drivers of optimal performance by Rich Divini and I cannot recommend it enough.
The title was brought up in three episodes, first as a passing reference to something Melania Trump was selling, then with a host tentatively urging listeners to purchase it while questioning its tone. In a later episode the discussion turned critical, noting the high price, a Chanel‑style cover, and suggesting it might be an AI‑generated product rather than a genuine work. Overall, the podcast treated the book with skepticism and doubt about its authenticity.
It was mentioned that Melania Trump wrote a book with the same name. One of the podcast hosts expressed uncertainty about its content and whether it contained positive or negative remarks about them.
She just wrote a book called Melania.
Go out and buy it. It's great.
And if she says bad things about me, I'll call you all up and I'll say, don't buy it. Get rid of it.
The speaker noted that Melania Trump was selling this book for $150, and commented that the cover text looked similar to Chanel and that it did not appear to be a real book, suggesting it might be an AI-generated book.
And speaking of the transactional aspect of Melania you know she's out there selling a book like this it's called Melania. The cover looks like the same text as Chanel and it looks like an AI book like I don't know that doesn't even look to be like a real book right there.
In two episodes, Ben Meiselas highlighted the book as a resource that taught him about self‑confidence and offered broader insights into cognitive biases and decision‑making. He noted its availability on Shortform and recommended it as a valuable read. The overall tone was enthusiastic, indicating a strong endorsement.
It was mentioned as helping the speaker learn about self-confidence and was highlighted as one of the many books available on Shortform.
Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman, which helped me teach me about self-confidence and so much more!
It was mentioned in the context of helping the speaker learn about self-confidence, suggesting it might explore cognitive biases and decision-making.
thinking fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman which helped me teach me about self confidence and so much more
The Vision (The Passion Translation (TPT))
The speaker referred to a book about the events of the Manhattan DA's investigation of Donald Trump. The speaker implied the book may have been problematic because it could be seen as a violation of grand jury secrecy laws.
And then Pomerantz wrote a book about it, which frankly isn't helpful because by Pomerantz writing a book, now Jim Jordan is able to argue, well, you wrote a book about it. So now you can't testify.
— Episode: Trump Has Never Been MORE SCARED and GOP...
The speaker referred to a book about the events of the Manhattan DA's investigation of Donald Trump. The speaker implied the book may have been problematic because it could be seen as a violation of grand jury secrecy laws.
And then Pomerantz wrote a book about it, which frankly isn't helpful because by Pomerantz writing a book, now Jim Jordan is able to argue, well, you wrote a book about it. So now you can't testify.
A seven-year-old child was mentioned as possibly reading a book while at an event.
The seven year old is probably somewhere around here reading a book.
Books 1-7 (Slipcase)
The speaker referenced the entire seven-book series when comparing the number of times Donald Trump's name appeared in the unredacted Epstein files to the references to 'Harry' within the books.
there's more references to Donald Trump in the Epstein files that have been released than to the word Harry in the seven Harry Potter books.
— Episode: Tuesday Afternoon Breaking News Updates...
The speaker referenced the entire seven-book series when comparing the number of times Donald Trump's name appeared in the unredacted Epstein files to the references to 'Harry' within the books.
there's more references to Donald Trump in the Epstein files that have been released than to the word Harry in the seven Harry Potter books.
The panel noted that Trump's name appeared more often in the Epstein files than Harry Potter's name appears across the seven Harry Potter books.
Trump's name also appears more times in the Epstein file than Harry Potter's name appears in the seven books about Harry Potter.
The Original 1925 Edition (Booklover's Library Classics)
The host referenced the novel when describing Trump's alleged "great Gatsby parties" with halfnaked women, using it as a cultural shorthand rather than recommending the book.
You've spent 25 to 35 percent of your term in this regime like golfing and doing great Gatsby parties with half naked women in martini glasses with the theme.
— Episode: Trump Reveals New Tests as Health Collap...
The host referenced the novel when describing Trump's alleged "great Gatsby parties" with halfnaked women, using it as a cultural shorthand rather than recommending the book.
You've spent 25 to 35 percent of your term in this regime like golfing and doing great Gatsby parties with half naked women in martini glasses with the theme.
The hosts referenced The Great Gatsby when describing Trump's lavish parties at MaraLago, noting they were themed after the novel to flaunt wealth disparity.
Is that why you're having these great Gatsby-themed parties at Mar-a-Lago to just rub the wealth disparity that you're making even worse in everybody's face?
great Gatsby-themed party of basically half-naked girls or women in champagne glasses, like dancing around and gyrating.
How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man
The host referenced the book in passing to provide background on Donald Trump's family dynamics and psychological profile, noting its coverage of his upbringing. The brief mention was used to contextualize discussion of the subject's family without a detailed endorsement.
A Modest Proposal
The hosts noted that the book was referenced by Trump’s legal team as a tongue‑in‑cheek comment, and the judge clarified that it was a satirical allusion to Jonathan Swift’s essay. They described the title as a satirical proposal about sending men to Montana for retraining, highlighting its humorous intent rather than endorsing its content.
E. Jean Carroll's book was mentioned in passing, where the title was used by Donald Trump's lawyers in an attempt to suggest she hated all men, which the judge refuted as a satirical literary reference.
And the judge was basically saying, oh you are you're just making a literary reference there as a joke because the question was so ridiculous to Jonathan Swift's satirical essay.
And then Joe Toccapina said, oh there you're prejudiced that's why there should be a mistrial.
The book was described as satirical. It was mentioned in the context of Eugene Carroll's satirical statement about sending all men to Montana to be retrained, which was referenced during cross-examination in the trial. The court acknowledged that it was a satirical reference to Jonathan Swift's 'A Modest Proposal,' a satirical essay that suggests the poor Irish people could alleviate their economic troubles by selling their children as food to the rich.
At one point I think in your book you propose we should dispose of all men. And she answers, yeah, into Montana. And he thinks like he's got her, right? He's like question into Montana answer. And she goes, yeah, and retrain them.
Question so retrain. So all the men here in this courtroom in this country all get shuffled off to Montana and get retrained. So at that point, he thinks that he's got this moment.
You do understand that that was satire, right?
It comes from Jonathan Swift's 'A Modest Proposal' 700 years ago, right?
Yeah. And the court's like, all right, let's well, it also does come from Jonathan Swift's 'A Modest Proposal' like read Jonathan Swift's 'A Modest Proposal'. It is a satirical essay that is about that. It's about the poor. It's about the aristocracy. It's about the attitudes towards the poor of the rich. And it's known as being this piece of literary genius. Now, one of the top satirical works in the entire English language that, you know, through satire suggests that the impoverished Irish people could ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to the rich. So that's what Eugene is playing off of in her book. It's a reference to that's what her book is called. Her book is called 'What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal.'
A Memoir
The hosts noted that the book was cited as evidence in Hunter Biden's gun case, highlighting his admission of addiction and failure to check the required box when purchasing a firearm. They discussed how those passages were leveraged by prosecutors to build their case, treating the memoir more as a legal liability than a recommendation. Overall, the book was referenced critically rather than being promoted.
This was referenced as Hunter Biden writing in his book that he was addicted to drugs and did not check the box when he purchased a firearm while addicted to drugs.
Hunter Biden wrote in his book that he was addicted to drugs and did not check the box when he purchased a firearm during the period where he was addicted to drugs, that he was addicted to drugs.
Hunter Biden's book, "Beautiful Things," was mentioned in the context of the evidence used in his gun-related case, where admissions from the book about his struggles with addiction were used against him.
The evidence against Hunter Biden came in a book that Hunter Biden wrote where he was talking about his struggles with addiction and how he got over his struggles with addiction, and talking about how desperate he was when he was addicted to being accountable.
And he opened up in his book about how low it was for him. And that was used as the evidence in a case while the United States Supreme Court with Trump appointees are basically saying, bump stocks, you can have it, everyone, bump stocks are cool.
The Truth on What's Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward
The book was brought up when Kristi Noem described the difficult choices she faced, including euthanizing her dog and killing a goat, as examples of the hard decisions she has made in her life. She discussed these incidents during both episodes, and the co‑host highlighted the shocking nature of the revelations. The conversation focused on the controversial content rather than endorsing the work.
Kristi Noem discussed her book, explaining that it includes challenging decisions she's made, including the euthanasia of her dog, Cricket, due to aggression towards livestock and humans.
The truth of the story is that this was a working dog and it was not a puppy. It was a dog that was extremely dangerous.
It had come to us from a family who had found her way too aggressive. We were her second chance and she was the day she was put down was a day that she massacred livestock that were part of our neighbors.
She attacked me and it was a hard decision. And the reason it's in the book is because this book is filled with tough challenging decisions that I have to make throughout my life.
It was mentioned in the context of a shocking revelation, where Noem discussed killing her puppy and other livestock.
Cricket was a wire hair pointer about 14 months, I absolutely hated that dog, the dog was untrainable, at that moment I realized I had to put her down, it was not a pleasant job but it had to be done and after it was over I realized another unpleasant job needed to be done
she talks about killing her puppy and then killing a goat and she wrote she wrote that this fan that this male goat she thought was nasty and mean and musky and rancid so she so she killed it and she dragged it into a gravel pit and hurried back to the gravel pit to put it down because when she shot the goat she didn't kill the goat right away
Note: The book recommendations on this page are discovered automatically from podcast transcripts, and may be incorrect or incomplete.
Podcast Name