Politics Is for Power: How to Move Beyond Political Hobbyism, Take Action, and Make Real Change Cover
Podcast Mentions

Politics Is for Power How to Move Beyond Political Hobbyism, Take Action, and Make Real Change

Eitan Hersh

A brilliant condemnation of political hobbyism—treating politics like entertainment—and a call to arms for well-meaning, well-informed citizens who consume political news, but do not take political action. Who is to blame for our broken politics? The uncomfortable answer to this question starts wit...

Podcasts 4
Quotes 15
Pod Save America

It was mentioned as part of a discussion about political participation, with the author highlighting a disconnect between those who are intellectually engaged in politics and those who actively volunteer.

"

It's a really inefficient way to think about politics, like one 20 minute conversation at a time, but it works and works in a much more durable way than, you know, a postcard or a letter or something...

— Episode: The Path to Defeat Donald Trump (Ep. 1)

Episode: The Path to Defeat Donald Trump (Ep. 1)

It was mentioned as part of a discussion about political participation, with the author highlighting a disconnect between those who are intellectually engaged in politics and those who actively volunteer.

"

It's a really inefficient way to think about politics, like one 20 minute conversation at a time, but it works and works in a much more durable way than, you know, a postcard or a letter or something like that.

It's more durable and according to the research, more effective. It's also the perfect antidote to a problem called political hobbyism that Hirsch wrote an entire book about.

Hidden Brain

It was argued that many Americans are engaging in politics more for emotional satisfaction rather than pursuing real change, which can be ultimately self-defeating.

"

In his book, Politics is for Power, Eitan makes the case that millions of Americans are engaging in politics in ways that are emotionally satisfying but ultimately self-defeating.

— Episode: Passion Isn't Enough

Episode: Passion Isn't Enough

It was argued that many Americans are engaging in politics more for emotional satisfaction rather than pursuing real change, which can be ultimately self-defeating.

"

In his book, Politics is for Power, Eitan makes the case that millions of Americans are engaging in politics in ways that are emotionally satisfying but ultimately self-defeating.

So I would imagine that a lot of people listening to you would disagree with your assessment of them.

And as I say in the book, I live right near Fenway Park.

So there it is. What news do political junkies demand? Outrage and gossip. Why? Because it's alluring. What news do we avoid? Local news. Why? It's boring. What do we think of our partisan opponents? We hate them. Do we really hate them? No, but politics is more fun if we root for a team and spew anger at the other side.

It's easier to hate and dismiss the other side than to empathize and connect to them. When do we vote? When there's a spectacle. When do we click? When politics can be a frivolous distraction. When do we donate? When there's a cocktail party or a viral video.

Episode: Passion Isn't Enough

It was argued that many Americans are engaging in politics in ways that are emotionally satisfying but ultimately self-defeating, and often more like a hobby than a serious effort to affect change.

"

In his book, Politics is for Power, Eitan makes the case that millions of Americans are engaging in politics in ways that are emotionally satisfying, but ultimately self-defeating.

What feels right to him? It seemed to me that the way that people are doing politics is much more similar to a hobby than to what I think of as politics, which is acquiring power.

So they will learn a lot of facts and talk about those facts. They will participate in a kind of craft. Like they'll go online and share memes, have a discussion very similar to how sports fans listen to sports radio.

What news do political junkies demand? Outrage and gossip. Why? Because it's alluring. What news do we avoid? Local news. Why? It's boring.

When we come back, even as many political hobbyists expand their energies on the latest outrage on Twitter, Eitan Hirsch argues there are other people who are very serious about acquiring and wielding power.

10% Happier with Dan Harris

The book discussed moving from grief to resilience and anger to courage, focusing on agency and individual action as well as systems change. The final part reportedly focused on a relationship with a father who was sick and dying, suggesting that the small things in life are what truly matter.

"

I'll be really honest and vulnerable I hope it's germane uh my mind goes back and forth I mean the topics are I think totally relevant like I have a chapter on moving from grief to resilience I have a...

— Episode: Sharon Salzberg Makes Me Feel Better

Episode: Sharon Salzberg Makes Me Feel Better

The book discussed moving from grief to resilience and anger to courage, focusing on agency and individual action as well as systems change. The final part reportedly focused on a relationship with a father who was sick and dying, suggesting that the small things in life are what truly matter.

"

I'll be really honest and vulnerable I hope it's germane uh my mind goes back and forth I mean the topics are I think totally relevant like I have a chapter on moving from grief to resilience I have a chapter on moving from anger to courage um I have a chapter on agency you know finding it's a little bit like what you're saying before finding that sense of agency what can I do what can I control so I don't feel helpless

there's an arc in the book which was almost unintentional where I moved from individual action to kind of seeking systems change by having that kind of vision and then I move back to individual action where the last part of the book is about somebody in his relationship with his father and his father's very sick and dying and how he was with that toward the end

Search Engine

In the episode, the book was introduced as a work that defines "political hobbyism" and draws a line between casual observers and those who aim to influence political outcomes. Paige highlighted this distinction, noting the author's focus on moving beyond hobbyist engagement. The mention was informational rather than a strong endorsement.

Episode: Is there a sane way to follow this election?

This book discusses the concept of "political hobbyism," differentiating between those who follow politics as a hobby and those actively seeking to influence outcomes.

"

he's got this book called Politics is for Power, and he makes a distinction between hobbyists and people trying to actually affect things in politics

Note: The book recommendations on this page are discovered automatically from podcast transcripts, and may be incorrect or incomplete.