The book was written from the perspective of OJ Simpson, hypothetically outlining how the murders might have happened if he had committed them. Kim Goldman was highly critical of the book, calling it a "manual for murder" and ultimately gained ownership of it through bankruptcy proceedings.
"
And what was interesting about Faye Resnick's book, and I've said this after 20 years later, when you read it, there was another documentary that ESPN did, 30 for 30, that was truly, if you go back to Faye Resnick's book, everything she fucking said was true.
I remember being at like Barnes and Noble and picking it up and like didn't buy it, so don't worry, I didn't buy it, but I did look through it, and I was going, this is so weird, who writes this book?
The premise of the book was it was from OJ saying I didn't do it, but if I did it, this is this fantasy of a story that may have happened.
He was the most bizarre thing with a knife in his hand covered in blood, so I'm confused.
And then he realized what he was dealing with, and so but we ended up, was he just, was that like, so was that just terrifying for him to be like in a hotel room with him or wherever they met so that he could like get the story down like yeah.