The LOL Podcast

The hosts brought up the title during the episode, noting that they had never read the book while also claiming to have watched all of the movies, resulting in contradictory statements about their familiarity. No specific recommendation or critique was offered, and the discussion served only as a brief, casual reference.

The hosts briefly referenced the book when discussing a character named Gale, noting his connection to the series. No recommendation or critique was offered, making it a casual mention.

The hosts briefly referenced the lake scene from the title, noting they were unsure where it was filmed and that the location was not accessible to visitors.

The hosts referenced the book while comparing someone's behavior to the style of the Diary of a Wimpy Kid series, noting its characteristic tone. They mentioned it in passing without offering a recommendation or detailed discussion.

The hosts brought up the series while joking about casting spells, noting that one of them was watching it for the first time. They treated it as a cultural reference rather than a recommendation. The discussion was light‑hearted and informal.

The hosts brought up the book while discussing a cute button‑eyed doll, comparing it to the terrifying doll from the story. They noted the book’s creepy doll imagery but did not offer a recommendation, simply mentioning it in passing.

The hosts asked who wrote the classic play and noted Shakespeare as the author, providing a brief factual reference without further discussion. This mention served only to identify the writer and did not involve any recommendation or critique of the title.

In the episode, a host playfully compared a teammate's appearance to the girlfriend from the book, using it as a lighthearted tease. No further discussion or recommendation of the title was offered, and the reference served only as a casual pop‑culture nod.

The hosts described the book as a crazy but compelling memoir that explored the author's fraught relationship with her mother and her time in the entertainment industry. They noted that the audiobook felt like an intimate conversation with the author, and they expressed that it was genuinely good and worth listening to.

In one episode, a host noted that they had watched the title many times, indicating personal familiarity with the story. No specific recommendation or critique was offered, making it a brief, casual mention.

The hosts referenced the book as the source of a certificate they opened, noting that it came from the Guinness World Records publication. No further discussion of its content or value was provided, resulting in a brief mention.

The hosts briefly brought up the title while talking about the characters' names, noting that it also had a movie adaptation. One host asked if anyone had read the series, indicating it was a casual reference rather than a deep recommendation. The overall tone was light and informal.

The hosts briefly referenced the book while discussing a movie scene and a creature that was bitten inside the holes. They mentioned liking the movie but did not elaborate on the story itself. The mention was short and informal.

In the episode, the hosts briefly referenced the series while discussing a character, noting that the idea originated from the book. The mention was casual and not presented as a recommendation.

The book was briefly referenced when a participant likened a 2020 scenario to the Walk of the Dead, noting its well‑known comic series roots. No specific recommendation or critique was offered, and the mention served only as a casual comparison.

The hosts briefly referenced the title while trying to identify a lyric, initially attributing it to the book before correcting themselves. They did not discuss its content or recommend it, and the mention was limited to that guessing game.

The hosts briefly discussed the title during a roundup episode, comparing it to the first film in the series and noting it as a well‑known example of popular fantasy. Their comments were light‑hearted and primarily used the book as a cultural reference rather than a recommendation.