People vs. Donald Trump An Inside Account

So Pomerantz writes this book, which I'm sure you're aware of, where he says we put together the legal eagles to get Trump. We got all these folks together and we assembled them for that purpose.

So Pomerantz writes this book, which I'm sure you're aware of, where he says, we put together the legal eagles to get Trump. We got all these folks together and we assembled them for that purpose.

Mark Pomerance, a former prosecutor in the AG's office who wrote a book on this is not relevant.

Reporter Jesse Isinger documents this meeting in his book on the decline of white collar prosecutions.

A new U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York gathered his team and asked his prosecutors a question, 'who here has never had an acquittal or a hung jury?'

The new U.S. attorney then mocked everyone who raised their hands for not taking enough risks or going after tough prosecutions.

you are members of what we like to call the chicken shit club for not pursuing riskier prosecutions.

because this was a I guess you'd call it a task force of really brilliant people, including Mark Pomerantz, who wrote a tell all book about which gave me really for me was like a groundbreaking event because for the first time, a defense attorney like me got a look at the inner workings of a task force of really brilliant prosecutors.

that the he confirmed something that I always thought was true, that prosecutors, whether state or federal, are subtly or psychologically reluctant to indict a former president.

Don't shy away from a difficult prosecution.

He was on this show a couple of months ago with a new book in which he criticizes Alvin Bragg for not moving faster in these prosecutions of Donald Trump.

In his book, Donald Trump versus the people, he outlines this idea that everyone on his legal team, the team that was investigating potential financial crimes that Trump committed, harbored no doubts about the fact that Donald Trump committed a crime or multiple crimes, which is potentially what Jim Jordan might hear from Pomerance if he ultimately decides to appear before the committee.

But this is what he says in his book. Donald Trump is guilty and he should have been prosecuted long ago. He should have been prosecuted for more than what he's been prosecuted for.

But Jordan has stated that he believes that Pomerance's book and the pressure that it might have put on Alvin Bragg bolsters their case that Bragg acted out of political motivations as opposed to moving for legal reasons as a prosecutor.

But some of the other hurdles that Pomerance talks about was a statute of limitations, along with evidence issues and bringing forward potentially a tarnished witness in Michael Cohen.

He was on this show a couple of months ago with a new book in which he criticizes Alvin Bragg for not moving faster in these prosecutions of Donald Trump.

He resigned again out of frustration. And in his book, Donald Trump versus the People, he outlines this idea that everyone on his legal team, the team that was investigating potential financial crimes that Trump committed, harbored no doubts about the fact that Donald Trump committed a crime or multiple crimes,

Donald Trump is guilty and he should have been prosecuted long ago.

He should have been prosecuted for more than what he's been prosecuted for.

How does this book, which is chock full of what Mr. Pomerantz calls an insider account, how does it not disclose mental impressions, deliberations at the office, the internal workings of the district attorney's office?

And she was very focused on the fact that Mark wrote a book in which he talked about various things including, as she put it, deliberations that occurred within the Manhattan DA's office.

So the waiver question probably does not favor the Pomerantz and Alvin Bragg view that he doesn't need to testify.

the DA's office didn't take aggressive action with respect to the book in timely fashion.

Why do they care so much now?