Podcast
On Being with Krista Tippett
In his 2007 book, David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, while also questioning what it would take for the collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive rather than divisive. It was mentioned as the best anti-gay marriage book available.
In his 2007 book, The Future of Marriage, even as David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, he wondered what would it take for our collective confrontation with this issue to bec...
— Episode: David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch — T...
Episode: David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch — The Future...
In his 2007 book, David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, while also questioning what it would take for the collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive rather than divisive. It was mentioned as the best anti-gay marriage book available.
In his 2007 book, The Future of Marriage, even as David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, he wondered what would it take for our collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive rather than divisive?
But the best thing to this day is still his 2007 book, is a 2007 which is future marriage. It's still the best anti-gay marriage saying that because it's got a good preface.
Episode: [Unedited] David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch wi...
In his 2007 book, David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, but also questioned how to make the collective confrontation with this issue redemptive rather than divisive. He later changed his position and approach, advocating for new coalitions.
In his 2007 book, The Future of Marriage, even as David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good. He wondered what would it take for our collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive rather than divisive?
Episode: David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch — The Future...
In his 2007 book, David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, but also questioned what it would take for the collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive instead of divisive. It was mentioned as the best anti-gay marriage argument.
In his 2007 book, The Future of Marriage, even as David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good, he wondered what would it take for our collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive rather than divisive?
But in the summer of 2012 he announced a change of direction. My intention is to try something new, he wrote in the New York Times. Instead of fighting gay marriage, I'd like to help build new coalitions bringing together gayes who want to strengthen marriage with straight people who want to do the same.
the best thing to this day is still his 2007 book is a 2007 which is future marriage. It's still the best anti-gameria saying that because it's got a good preface.
Episode: [Unedited] David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch wi...
David Blankenhorn's 2007 book, initially arguing against gay marriage as a social good, later prompted reflection on how to make the discussion less divisive and more redemptive. It was mentioned multiple times in the context of his evolving views on the topic.
In his 2007 book, The Future of Marriage, even as David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good. He wondered what would it take for our collective confrontation with this issue to become redemptive rather than divisive?
In his 2007 book, The Future of Marriage, even as David Blankenhorn argued against gay marriage as a social good.
So the paperback of my book's coming out, I want to take your highly critical review and use it as the forward.