Podcast
The Shawn Ryan Show
The book was highlighted as a cautionary tale about how progressive policies have harmed cities like San Francisco, especially regarding homelessness and addiction. Michael Shellenberger discussed it as a critique of what he called compassionate but ultimately cruel approaches, noting the backlash it received from outlets such as The New York Times. The conversation framed the title as an important perspective on the unintended consequences of liberal urban policies.
Episode: #87 Michael Shellenberger - The Demise of Californ...
It was written as a critique of progressive policies and their unintended consequences, specifically focusing on homelessness and addiction in San Francisco, which the author viewed as cruelty rather than compassion.
I couldn't understand. We say we're so compassionate. We think we're more compassionate than other people in other states. But this is cruelty.
When the book came out, I was criticized. The New York Times, of course, they didn't like my book. And they claimed I had not interviewed any homeless people, which was hilarious.
They give cash, $600, $650 a month in cash to people if they're homeless, including if they're coming from out of state.
I wanted to understand why that was. That's why I wrote San Francisco.
I first visited California when I was 15...And we saw mentally ill people on the streets, you know, the first wave of homelessness in the 80s was a combination of releasing people out of mental hospitals without proper care in the community, combined with the crack epidemic.