Podcast
The Matt Walsh Show
Matt Walsh discussed the book by outlining its premise that any law enacted before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumed unconstitutional, arguing that statutes created by older white legislators are inherently racist and misogynistic and therefore should be abolished. He presented the author as a self‑described brilliant legal mind and noted the book’s focus on removing such “bad” laws.
Episode: Ep. 1567 - Why I Went To Speak In Front Of The Cal...
Matt Walsh described the book as proposing that every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumed unconstitutional, arguing that laws authored by white men before that date are fundamentally flawed.
He has a new book out called Bad Law which is apparently all about the laws that he thinks are bad and that we should get rid of because he says that a lot of laws are racist and misogynist so we should just do away with them.
My premises for the book is that every law passed before the 1965 voting rights act should be presumptively unconstitutional because before the 1965 voting rights act we were functionally an apartheid country not everybody who lived here could vote here.
Every law written by old white guys should be abolished; they are presumptively unconstitutional. He describes himself as a brilliant legal mind and calls the book Bad Law.