Podcast
Strict Scrutiny
This case, which involved the proper interpretation of a federal criminal law about statutory minimum sentences, had an earlier heated exchange between Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, where the dissent encouraged readers to check a journal or book for why the dissent was right.
Justice Sotomayor had written the majority opinion. Justice Kagan wrote a dissent and the dissent described the majority's made up sentence as proving the dissent's point and encouraged readers to quo...
— Episode: Anti-Abortion Litigation at Warp Speed
Episode: Anti-Abortion Litigation at Warp Speed
This case, which involved the proper interpretation of a federal criminal law about statutory minimum sentences, had an earlier heated exchange between Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, where the dissent encouraged readers to check a journal or book for why the dissent was right.
Justice Sotomayor had written the majority opinion. Justice Kagan wrote a dissent and the dissent described the majority's made up sentence as proving the dissent's point and encouraged readers to quote pick up a journal or a book or for that matter a Supreme Court opinion to see why the dissent was right.