Podcast
Generation Why: True Crime
The book was presented as a 15‑year collection of essays that introduced previously unpublished research, new witness statements, and revised details about the Whitechapel murders. Its author explained that it aimed to clarify the Ripper’s methods and potential suspects, positioning it as a higher‑quality alternative to the many mediocre titles on the subject. The discussion highlighted the book’s fresh insights and its value for listeners interested in more rigorous Jack the Ripper scholarship.
Episode: Ripper Confidential - 254
It is a collection of essays written over 15 years, many of which were written for this book and had never been published before. It includes new information about the Ripper's attacks, possible survivors, and witness statements, and presents updated and corrected information from previously published articles.
So what is old is new again.
And the more we know about how he operated and, you know, and the people involved in the case, the closer, you know, we get a little bit closer each time to deciding who he wasn't because so many suspects have been put forth over the years.
But there are a handful of authors and researchers, myself included, who that's what we do is we look for new things and we present new things to the reading public, people who are interested.
The book is a collection of essays, uh, written by myself, um, over the course of 15 years.
In fact, uh, people who are speaking of documentaries a year or two ago, there came one called the missing evidence, Jack, the Ripper, the missing evidence, which claimed Jack, the Ripper was in fact Charles Letchmere, AKA Charles cross.
Episode: Ripper Confidential - 254
It is a collection of essays written over 15 years, many of which were written for this book and had not been published elsewhere. It contains new information about the Ripper's attacks, possible survivors, and witness statements, aiming to present a clearer picture of the Ripper's modus operandi and identity.
More books have been written about the Ripper than about John F. Kennedy or any other president, and there's no end to it.
The majority of Ripper books that come out are not any ... I'm just going to be honest, they're not very good books, most of them.
The book is a collection of essays all written by myself over the course of 15 years.
And I chose to put that out as Ripper Confidential. And it's a potpourri of different things.
In fact, people who are speaking of documentaries, a year or two ago there came one called The Missing Evidence, Jack the Ripper, The Missing Evidence, which claimed Jack the Ripper was in fact Charles Lechmere, aka Charles Cross, the man who discovered Polly Nichols' body. They're arguing that he wasn't the man who discovered her body. He's the man who murdered her.